There's no need to ban proxies in order to punish *one* member while others are using them correctly. To do so would punish the intended one or two spammers, but the net would also catch other users who are using it correctly.
>>6There's no point in banning a name of a spammer simply because they'll have no trouble switching names, similar to how they switch proxies. (But yes, it is possible)
So, that still leaves the problem at hand. How to get rid of spammers coming in from multiple ip's?
I'll list a few options, but keep in mind that I'm just throwing as many possible out there.
1) The problem with banning ip's is that other users get called samefagging when they may be on the same network.
Now, I know this may be a radical thought, but listen:
What if we removed ID's?
The obvious downside: plenty of samefags. However, this would help those who share a connection, while still banning proxies.
But then again, we'd have plenty of samefags.
Now, why are samefags bad?
Simply put, they're annoying. Seeing someone argue/ agree with themselves is annoying. The reason we don't like samefags is because they're annoying.
Take away the power to identify them, however, and suddenly you're left in a blind, ignorant state.
I know this may seem strange, but we'd never have to deal with samefags again, simply because there would be no way to call them out besides posting style. Again, we'd be in an ignorant bliss.
2) This one's rather simple.
We ignore GHF and other spammers, and bump off their posts from the visible 3 in every thread, deleting posts after. Now, this will only cut down some of the posting, but it's a partial solution.
3) More efficient moderation.
Spammers are either one of two main kinds:
-They spam as far as possible and as quickly as possible
-They spam consistently in one area
Now, obviously GHF is mainly in ONE THREAD. All Reltair would have to do would check that one thread per day and clean up some posts.
Now, I'd like to discuss in particular the "we need to keep banning ______" problem.
I'm not sure as to why you keep submitting ban requests, so let me explain.
All GHF has done is express their opinion.
Sure, it's hateful, stupid, and obviously written with the grammatical skills of a kid in middle school, but it's just that:
An opinion.
The only thing we ban for is by porn, gore, and overt spamming.
Now, I can see how we might have a grey area of banning GHF because of the spamming. However, he/ she/ it has kept mostly to one thread, and as annoying as it is, it's not really the spamming we put out bans for.
No, we usually only ban for spamming multiple boards with the same/ similar message over and over again. We've all been through a time or two when this was happened, and it was dealt with efficiently.
However, GHF has kept to one thread, repeatedly shouting their opinion over and over like some kind of child who needs attention (and probably is).
If we banned based on repeated instances of an opinion, then we might as well ban everyone who says "yeah I like that feature too!" every time someone posts in their (INSERT GAME NAME HERE) thread. It's the same thing, really. (Just less annoying and hurtful to others)
But if it's hurtful to others, shouldn't we ban them?
Well, then we would also need to ban all the older members as well. Don't tell me that there hasn't been a time or two (or several, even) where you repeatedly told people who made new, irrelevant threads on a board to fuck off. Almost every time a new thread is made in error, it's bombarded with the same hateful message over and over.
And yet we don't ban those people, because they "have the same opinion as we do." A lot of people agree when there is a thread made erroneously, hence why they keep doing it.
Hell, members aren't even banned for PURPOSEFULLY spamming spiderman pictures in threads they find erroneous, case in point. (I'm not saying those threads were made correctly, I'm simply pointing out that they are still spammed in a similar manner).
So really, these kinds of bans go down to "who has a different opinion than me that I can ban because I don't like them?", which is ridiculous.
There's no really good solution to this, as it's a rather grey area. I apologize in advance if any part of this came off as hostile, or was simply too damn long to read (which is understandable).
/thread