>>4 He was saying "dont think so" to "Wasn't there already a thread regarding this?"
And I think this is the first I'm hearing of a timed ban system, though the issue of the "ban" function not actually banning has been brought up, if only as a passing mention. Bottom line being, Pint's other points still hold up.
>>5 Read
>>2.
As is said on all threads regarding the chat's issues, Reltair is
NOT responsible for fixing those, nor will he likely go to the trouble of doing. The chat was not his own code, it was an open source code made by Suin that he threw on top of the site after popular demand. It is not priority.
The code is still available somewhere for those who are curious, though he took it down already after updating it - but nonetheless, one would have to understand Japanese to be able to mess with the code properly.