Dollars BBS | Suggestions

feed-icon

Main

Introductions

Countries

Missions

Suggestions

News

Animation

Art

Comics

Films

Food

Games

Literature

Music

Personal

Sports

Technology

Random

New Thread Restriction (76)

1 Name: Ayanavi : 2011-09-17 01:55 ID:Q4BMDTUn [Del]

I'm probably not the only one getting tired of threads in anime/literature/manga/music/film/games that quite literally equate to an image of the thread topic and some variation of the sentence "I like this, who has seen/heard it?"

The suggestion is thus - What if threads had a minimum character count before you could make them? Falling under the threshold would result in a message saying something along the lines of "That's kind of lazy, try adding more information to your thread."

As an aside note, the same general concept could be added to posts - Your posts must have X amount of characters in them before they can be submitted. I think this idea is a bit less applicable due to the fact that some posts really don't merit the use of more than a few words - But it's something to think about.

2 Name: Pintapau !bAr4R5f0RY : 2011-09-17 12:12 ID:Nurp12HM [Del]

Sounds interesting and doable, but I know jack about code so I should shut my mouth about that. The only potential problem I can see is people then spouting out more drivel in a stream of consciousness manner to simply get enough characters out to beat the restriction. Kind of like diarrhea with how there will be words everywhere and quality of posts will still be shit. Kind of like this post - words, words everywhere but no legible thought in easy sight. At least I'm using punctuation to make it easier though.

3 Name: bang-bang : 2011-09-17 15:37 ID:EzyXBcn/ [Del]

>>2 *shudder* Oh, the lack of punctuation.

I'd agree with this, but I think only for the thread part. Applying it to posts would basically kill a lot of opportunities for jokes and such.

But I don't know if enforcing this is the best thing to do. I mean, I'd usually go for educating people instead of forcing them to do something, because they may react negatively to the forcing part. Then again educating is forever doomed to fail here, so yeah maybe this is a good idea.

4 Name: *insertnamehere*!!mhJDjCwh : 2011-09-19 19:58 ID:vUZMBaZS [Del]

bump. Any more people talking about this?

5 Name: *insertnamehere*!!mhJDjCwh : 2011-10-02 12:59 ID:dJuFDCnT [Del]

bump

6 Name: *insertnamehere*!!mhJDjCwh : 2011-10-30 19:50 ID:AV3Nc0Kp [Del]

bump

7 Name: Kaori !!1M/QA3Sq : 2011-10-30 21:36 ID:QxLoLpH9 [Del]

actually there IS a word cap, i think its like 856 or something. yeah i was ranting one time and clicked reply and it was all: your post is too long, it exceeds 8** words.

I was like a fuuuuuuu, but dats okay. Yeah, unless you want a smaller word cap, i guess it's okay :3

8 Name: *insertnamehere*!!mhJDjCwh : 2011-10-30 21:40 ID:AV3Nc0Kp [Del]

>>7 No, that's not what she meant. She meant the post has to have X number of posts before being submitted. So let's say the X is 27 words. The post must have 27 words or more before posting. Get what I mean?

9 Name: Mael !DoMiNUIT9I : 2011-10-30 21:43 ID:SA1yooEY [Del]

Oh i certainly love this idea. I'm all for it.

10 Name: *insertnamehere*!!mhJDjCwh : 2011-10-30 21:44 ID:AV3Nc0Kp [Del]

Yes, I'm all for the idea too. Someone email it to Reltair.

11 Name: Umbra Serpens !T1rQ1UNnww : 2011-10-30 23:04 ID:m7cEdt7p [Del]

>>10 "Someone email it to Reltair"

Wouldn't it make a little more sense to just email him yourself, and say "I'm going to email Reltair"?

-Just a thought :P

12 Name: *insertnamehere*!!mhJDjCwh : 2011-10-30 23:11 ID:AV3Nc0Kp [Del]

>>11 "you fail to realize the extent of my laziness."

All of my hurrs and durrs. Also, I didn't really copy and paste, I typed it sadly.

13 Name: Umbra Serpens !T1rQ1UNnww : 2011-10-30 23:14 ID:m7cEdt7p [Del]

>>12 My words, they have been used against me!

It's funny how I'm willing to type a rant, yet even I I had a proper keyboard in front of me, I would rather generalize than use the Ctrl+F shortcut XD

14 Name: *insertnamehere*!!mhJDjCwh : 2011-10-30 23:16 ID:AV3Nc0Kp [Del]

Pft, your laziness has probably surpassed mine. You could say it's... OVER 9000. Yes, I went there. For shame, me!

15 Name: Umbra Serpens !T1rQ1UNnww : 2011-10-30 23:19 ID:m7cEdt7p [Del]

There is no shame in quoting such an awesome series. But considering what my rant was about, it makes the whole thing kind of useless lmao

Wait... No. OVER 9000 is technically an Internet meme. So it's still usable! FTW

16 Name: JakeW !7YpDmXZFeo : 2011-10-31 16:40 ID:0TIMwqgG [Del]

When i want to post something that only requires a few characters but theres a min char count i just type the response and hold the space key for like a minute XD

17 Name: Misuto!M4ZBq07Cs. : 2011-10-31 18:37 ID:MrnrH3gc [Del]

>>16 Thank you for providing an example of stupidity working around the system; The system particularly set in place to prevent stupidity.

Essentially, you go to great lengths to be stupid.

18 Name: Kaori !!1M/QA3Sq : 2011-10-31 20:16 ID:QxLoLpH9 [Del]

Misuto proud. J. K. ha. ha. ha. ha. laff with me. laff with me

>>8 Oh okay, that makes sense :Y but then again, people could just work around the system like >>16 said and just write a bunch of crap and then write what they want to say.

eg: hihihihihihihihihihihiihihih. Drrr2 petition anyone? hihihihihihihih

and so on :A I'm just saying. but sure, wutevar mommah wants

19 Name: *insertnamehere*!!mhJDjCwh : 2011-10-31 21:10 ID:AV3Nc0Kp [Del]

>>18 Read >>17 on why that wouldn't be possible. Ah fuck it I'll say it anyways. It's too stupid of an idea. I mean fuck, how fucking stupid could you get to do it. Goddamn. Hell, if enough people do it, I'd suggest a damn delete function where the forum deletes their post if it sense any sort of spam. But that's only if there is a sufficient amount of stupid and I really goddamn doubt anyone's gonna actually try this sort of stunt. I mean damn, we do have some illiterate faggots here but when the forum tells you your post is too short, you damn make sure it's longer legitimately, not by doing this sort of shit.

20 Name: Kaori !!1M/QA3Sq : 2011-10-31 22:35 ID:QxLoLpH9 [Del]

Yeah i know, i'm just saying you're always bound to get that one arsehole.

21 Name: Misuto!M4ZBq07Cs. : 2011-11-07 11:35 ID:WFbRuYdL [Del]

bump

22 Name: *insertnamehere*!!mhJDjCwh : 2011-11-12 17:16 ID:86AbckTt [Del]

bump. I want this to be put in even more, seeing all of the comments having only one word and shit, kinda annoys me.

23 Name: sleepology : 2011-11-12 22:47 ID:G0nh7ZtE [Del]

Well theres not much input that can be said, its either you agree with it or disagree with it.

24 Post deleted by user.

25 Post deleted by user.

26 Name: BarabiSama!!C8QPa1Mt : 2011-11-28 00:08 ID:k8Aw+FcQ [Del]

I... I like this. You have my vote.

27 Name: Rokuro !aGh7wDGyVI : 2011-11-28 00:31 ID:VuSZnJGB [Del]

It would certainly cut down on some of the idiocy. I'm in.

28 Name: sleepology : 2011-11-28 01:33 ID:uW5rbXT/ [Del]

Question is does anyone know how to implement it. And would it only be for 1st posts, or comments too.

29 Name: Koibito : 2011-11-28 06:52 ID:NEEQpyb7 [Del]

Hmmm...
Not bad.

30 Name: sleepology : 2011-11-28 10:42 ID:uW5rbXT/ [Del]

BBump

31 Name: BarabiSama!!C8QPa1Mt : 2011-11-28 15:14 ID:k8Aw+FcQ [Del]

Bump.

32 Name: $Kuroii$ : 2011-11-28 18:03 ID:N6fXSkGe [Del]

Good idea :D

33 Name: ChaCha : 2011-11-29 19:24 ID:wDlg3/V3 [Del]

If we used this for all additional posts and not just the thread starter, wouldn't bumps kind of go out the window?

34 Name: Ayanavi : 2011-11-29 19:28 ID:bmWsb2vt [Del]

Most likely, yes. Unless we started making all of our bumps very verbose.

Like... Get Misuto to write all our bumps for us, or something.

So just for thread-starting would be an ideal proposition.

35 Name: sleepology : 2011-11-29 20:22 ID:eE1ol8Nb [Del]

all in favor bug navi until she sends the bossman an email .-.

36 Name: tl;dr-suto!M4ZBq07Cs. : 2011-11-29 21:48 ID:HqBrbSVx [Del]

>>34 Perhaps I could be the author of such thread-resurfacing techniques, were this to be implemented, if your suggestion was in fact legitimate.

Yes, verily, I do say, it would serve to bypass the minimum character count as previously described in the original post, which is as follows, thusly:

"I'm probably not the only one getting tired of threads in anime/literature/manga/music/film/games that quite literally equate to an image of the thread topic and some variation of the sentence "I like this, who has seen/heard it?"

The suggestion is thus - What if threads had a minimum character count before you could make them? Falling under the threshold would result in a message saying something along the lines of "That's kind of lazy, try adding more information to your thread."

As an aside note, the same general concept could be added to posts - Your posts must have X amount of characters in them before they can be submitted. I think this idea is a bit less applicable due to the fact that some posts really don't merit the use of more than a few words - But it's something to think about."

The above repost was done for clarity, in case any details were left out of this brief explanation in which I referenced the original post of this thread regarding the suggestion of implementing a minimum character limit to individual posts with the purpose of eliciting content of a quality higher than a given threshold that is set as a standard for the community - which is to say, the internet web page, Dollars-BBS.

But perhaps one could rephrase this in a slightly more detailed manner, for I fear I have not gone into detail enough.

37 Name: *insertnamehere*!!mhJDjCwh : 2011-12-04 15:17 ID:l5YudWPg [Del]

bump

38 Name: Kaori !!Wr6AB6KD : 2011-12-04 19:39 ID:Rpb1XQLd [Del]

oh look. tldrsuto.....is tldr sorry /o/


oh snap. wut.

39 Post deleted by user.

40 Name: BarabiSama!!C8QPa1Mt : 2011-12-10 13:04 ID:YgkFX3nq [Del]

bump

41 Name: Tobi~ !Mjk4PcAe16 : 2011-12-10 17:36 ID:pqnGIREC [Del]

buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmp

42 Name: Yukio !DboM3.beAE : 2011-12-22 14:51 ID:sc0IpeML [Del]

BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUMP

43 Name: Thiamor !yZIDc0XLZY : 2011-12-22 15:22 ID:FHb1Ah4E [Del]

Bump

44 Name: Thiamor !yZIDc0XLZY : 2011-12-23 08:55 ID:FHb1Ah4E [Del]

Bump.

45 Name: Kaori !!Wr6AB6KD : 2011-12-25 10:59 ID:W+bD4fAt [Del]

bump. thanks for double posting to bump Thiamor

46 Name: Thiamor !yZIDc0XLZY : 2011-12-25 11:36 ID:FHb1Ah4E [Del]

Well it was one day after, and I had to bump stupid shit off the screen. IF that was sarcasm, I mean.

47 Name: Z£ΓØ : 2011-12-25 12:04 ID:1LJOdhGl [Del]

I used to bump threads like you, Then i took an arrow to the knee..

48 Name: sleepology : 2011-12-25 13:53 ID:rJudT8oq [Del]

He used to say things like that, but then he took an arrow to the face.

49 Name: Darasuum : 2011-12-27 12:06 ID:Mv9IW7pJ [Del]

its mostly just a sign that someone has spent to much time on fb and not enough time on looking at bbs. there is a saying "you can't hear very well when your mouth is open"
>>1 i agree that would help.

50 Name: BarabiSama!!C8QPa1Mt : 2012-05-10 13:36 ID:mQkhBcEm [Del]

^

51 Name: Vives !0qvjPx3R8I : 2012-05-19 00:49 ID:4SKZargN [Del]

I like this a lot. It's like... If you can't change the idiots, make the site change the idiots. Or something along those lines idk I'm tired.

52 Name: sleepology !CHs4eVJ3O2 : 2012-05-19 03:20 ID:KPuV6jBU [Del]

Alright, im in support of this thread.

53 Name: reilyx !.18ItdoukM : 2012-05-22 19:01 ID:qKsHwOsP [Del]

Has this yet been emailed to Reltair? If not, I've seen something similar implemented on other forums. The character minimum for posts is usually either 5 or 10, and is defeated by typing "/5char" or "/10char" after making a brief, usually snide one-word comment. So there is already a common method to making short posts when necessary, and it keeps light spam at bay I suppose.

I am in definite agreement with having a minimum for new threads though. Dear lord that would deal with so many poor threads T_T

54 Name: BarabiSama!!C8QPa1Mt : 2012-05-22 19:12 ID:TS1clmx4 [Del]

^

55 Name: Haru. !4Wf3m.ar1o : 2012-05-24 12:28 ID:ruxD2Pam [Del]

bump this.

56 Name: Tolua : 2012-05-25 21:56 ID:DbojKRqX [Del]

seems like a valuable bit of QA

57 Name: vychune !ikWwjGipnY : 2012-05-31 22:37 ID:FkVg83w+ [Del]

Love this idea. Bumpo

58 Name: atsuko : 2012-06-06 21:14 ID:oA2+Mi8F [Del]

bump

59 Name: Saz : 2012-06-07 15:56 ID:CWZOv9Sq [Del]

You know a BBS( bulleton bord system) is a photo board right?

60 Name: Marianna : 2012-06-07 18:59 ID:7wIN7sGf [Del]

I have another idea what if in this dollars site(the one we are on right now) we create a link that leads to another dollars site where to get into it we have another password and that site is strictly for dollars member who are serious about what the dollars stand for and want to help out in their community and come together to try to make this world better.

Also when that site is up we still keep this site active so people who enjoy this site can continue to meet the friends they made here and everything they enjoy about this site. Also any of the serious dollars members can at any time come back to this site just for fun or a quick change of scenery. For example me i like anime and all the other things this site currently has as well as helping any people with problems (which i have seen on this site a couple of times) all of that stuff i can get from this site, but i also like helping the community and am serious about the dollars.

If we do what i am suggesting i honestly believe this will solve many of our problems and at the same time everyone is happy (at least for the most part). It will also be a way to distinguish who is serious about this and who is not. I have more ideas about how this might work but first who agrees with this suggestion and to the people who are currently managing this site(if there are any still) what do you think? Is this possible and even a good idea?

61 Name: Thiamor !yZIDc0XLZY : 2012-06-08 01:06 ID:uTl1JlU/ [Del]

>>60
That fixes nothing.

62 Name: Marianna : 2012-06-08 01:15 ID:7wIN7sGf [Del]

>>61
Explain how does it fix nothing? I have been gone a while so i may be a little misinformed about what exactly the problem is.

63 Name: Thiamor !yZIDc0XLZY : 2012-06-08 18:29 ID:uTl1JlU/ [Del]

I don't see how it has anything to do with this topic, and I know of quite a few who wouldn't want random, fan filled sites to be linked to us, and us, to them. I don't see how it does anything good to help us.

64 Name: Nova : 2012-06-09 10:09 ID:FxSmYw0S [Del]

The Dollar's main cause is to show people that the world isn't as bad as it seems and I agree if someone posts a picture they should at least say something but if you want to complain go to the chat rooms.

65 Name: sleepology !CHs4eVJ3O2 : 2012-06-09 12:56 ID:dTVrExcj [Del]

>>64 not everyone has that mindset. Dont act like they do

66 Name: BarabiSama!!C8QPa1Mt : 2012-06-10 16:44 ID:cdypevfL [Del]

>>64 The chatrooms aren't even ours.

67 Name: BarabiSama!!C8QPa1Mt : 2012-07-04 23:18 ID:LFknN4xN [Del]

^

68 Name: GodHatesFags!8NBuQ4l6uQ : 2012-07-10 18:12 ID:Cs87JajM [Del]

BarabiSama is a bitch

69 Name: Alice !l14UvTg4qQ : 2012-07-13 23:41 ID:QRDbaeh3 [Del]

bump

70 Name: Alice !l14UvTg4qQ : 2012-07-13 23:41 ID:QRDbaeh3 [Del]

bump

71 Name: Alice !l14UvTg4qQ : 2012-07-13 23:42 ID:QRDbaeh3 [Del]

bump

72 Name: GodHatesFags!8NBuQ4l6uQ : 2012-07-14 13:58 ID:9u4JhmaH [Del]

This little thread of yours, im ganna let it die. This little thread of yours, im ganna let it die. This little thread of yours, im ganna let it die. Let it die! Let it die! Let it die!

73 Name: GodHatesFags!8NBuQ4l6uQ : 2012-07-14 13:58 ID:9u4JhmaH [Del]

This little thread of yours, im ganna let it die. This little thread of yours, im ganna let it die. This little thread of yours, im ganna let it die. Let it die! Let it die! Let it die!

74 Name: GodHatesFags!8NBuQ4l6uQ : 2012-07-14 13:58 ID:9u4JhmaH [Del]

This little thread of yours, im ganna let it die. This little thread of yours, im ganna let it die. This little thread of yours, im ganna let it die. Let it die! Let it die! Let it die!

75 Name: BarabiSama!!C8QPa1Mt : 2012-08-01 09:55 ID:0459Za4L [Del]

^

76 Name: BarabiSama!!C8QPa1Mt : 2012-08-03 10:23 ID:0459Za4L [Del]

^