>>7 Actually, while digital audio files do manage to store and preserve the same recording, it still cannot beat a new vinyl record in sound quality. I will concede digital audio files are better because the quality of the music does not degrade over time or through use whereas vinyls are prone to warping and the needle slowly depreciates the sound quality through usage (and the needle also depreciates). Using a cactus needle however can extend the life of a record 10 fold though, and the sounds are much more real than with a digital file. (Almost all digital music is edited, buffered, blended and the like, so the sound is not so 'real').
Digital only allows you take it on the go, but you do lose some sound quality compared to vinyl records. Editing the audio file attempts to make up for it, so it still sounds great, but vinyl is better. Its only a revolution in the sense that anyone can record a digital file and upload it to itunes and what not for people to download (partial reason for why talent became irrelevant) and that people now download music more because one a lot of you get it for free, two its cheaper than vinyl records, and three its portable.
But hey, thats my take on this thing, I am not saying you have to agree with me, but I will defend my position when called upon to do so.