>>6 I would agree with this, except for time. Time may or may not have a smallest possible length. Space, as I am aware, does, which is described by the Planck length. We don't know about time, though, but I suspect it works the same as space, given that it is intertwined with it.
Also, scientists and mathematicians disagree on the concept of infinite. Physicists mostly believe each dimension has a zero value of all higher dimensions, such that a 2-d plane has no depth. Not a small depth, 0 depth. Mathematicians, of course, don't think it exists. They assume that each dimension curves very slightly, so that you don't need to stack infinite planes on top of each other to make a cube.
This doesn't make sense to me, because it seems like some convenient fix for math that doesn't make sense.
In my opinion, infinite is a concept. It has no length. It is something that never ends, which is why it is a loop. The universe is not infinite, because it is expanding. It couldn't possibly expand if it was already infinite, in my opinion. Space and time are finite, because I think the Planck length will also apply to time.
It's a good question that warrants more discussion, though it will be purely opinionated given out lack of factual evidence supporting anything.