I wish to doff/cut out religion!!!

Radiometric dating (stemming in radiocative decay ~ neutron bombardment with nitrogen particles...) contradicts biblically aligned 6 24 hour day earth creation event. (Contrastingly, rather, existent are billion-years-aged modicum zircon crystals)


How?
Neutrons (a component in radiometric dating) generate information regarding materials abound our world.
Such involves molecular biology, biochemical engineering, drug synthesis, together with
manufacturing methodologies, computing...

(Semi-specifically; neutrons prescribe a means to determine atomic orientation via 'scattering'.)

1={ Neutron scattering/diffraction -> 2nAsin(θ+ϕ) = λB -- "how does light travel through an object?"}
2={ smart phones, medicine }

1 -> 2!!!!!




~WHY IS RELIGION INVALID?
Religion is a boundary on intelligence/advancement....

...
Newton encountered God precisely at the limit of his understanding abound orbital bodies. (See Newtonian principia)

Laplace, (who disregarded God) expanded-solved (where Newton had halted therein)
the theorem proof, to account in greater numbers of orbital bodies [orbital resonance]

Neil Tyson [physicist]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BH0LUptkzkE

What are you trying to prove? We all know that religion drags the advancement of humanity but without religion, people wouldn't have beliefs that will tell them what's is wrong or right. Otherwise, we would still be fighting with nuclear wars.

Pretty sure this would be better placed on the Random board... Thoughts of others?

@Jill
One needn't religion to maintain 'morality'.
If one performs mathematical analysis, one finds a type of paradox; wherein hierarchies of configuration of atoms ensue amidst a global computational limit.

From the data, one may derive that par exemplification, consumption is invalid, albeit existent.

Ironically, one, who analyses existence, prescribes that all things require equivalent consideration-wherein consumption of 'lower' lifeforms is but invalid.

'Moral' religion starkly sanctions dominion via mankind betwixt earth's animals.

Albeit, if one maintains religion (typical religion) whilst utilizing modern technologies (internet, smart phones) thereafter one persists hypocritically, as such methodologies contradict directly many a religious aspect (earth's creation time, age)

Considering that Dollars is quite a diverse group of people, I don't think you should be effectively insulting every religious person on here with this post, especially on the Main Board as it's the first thing we see

Ah but without the order of religion, where would the fun of rebellion be? How can we enjoy the weeding out of those meant to fill their life with chaos and joy from those meant to be blind sheep and fodder for the excitement of others? Is not rebellion one of the greatest pleasures of sin?

I don't think this should be on the main board to be honest.

A singularity is yet close...

With the insurgence of 'synthetic' intelligence (deep artificial neural network mechanisms), this malignful universe shall be re-aligned.

Albeit, such metamorphosis shall be closer absent religion's 'silently' permeating boundary....

@Siren: ^
@Sin: Fun is indeed irrelevant.
@Blanc: I am logically bound in factum. I am absent the desire of excoriation. My goal state solely lay in re-computing this malignful universe....

Indeed, shall this universe ensue computable:

Transition sequence sigmas (ie adinkra deriviations/matrix operations) on hierarchies of partner particle configurations occur vis a vis claude-ressembling error code boundaries.. (James Gates)

thereafter...

I wish nothing for myself; I wish solely that this consumptive existence is realigned... Such is perhaps attainable with science and technology... If cosmological ¿constants yielded an energy transference bounded universe, by modus ponens, it perhaps follows that such ¿constants are affixable... This universe is but a program whose underlying construct is starkly outdated....