Dollars BBS | Technology

feed-icon

Main

News

Animation

Art

Comics

Films

Food

Games

Literature

Music

Personal

Sports

Technology

Random

Canada made the invisibility cloak (18)

1 Name: PhiRagon : 2013-03-24 05:23 ID:qffyh1jh (Image: 460x643 jpg, 88 kb) [Del]

src/1364120584148.jpg: 460x643, 88 kb
A Canadian company called Hyperstealth is reporting that it has developed Quantum Stealth, a material that renders the target “completely invisible by bending light waves around the target.” If the mock-up photos are to be believed, Quantum Stealth basically works like Harry Potter’s invisibility cloak.
~ AMAZING

2 Name: Thiamor (on another computer) !Enough.h12 : 2013-03-24 13:17 ID:5CJQHeUB [Del]

Yet where is a link to any other news articles stating such, other than a picture?

Secondly you lose all potential credit because of the fucking 9GAG tag in the bottom, left hand corner.

3 Name: holygodslayer : 2013-03-24 18:48 ID:gaC1xq5r [Del]

cant green screen also work for this kinda?

4 Name: Nobody !nNP0bPAimE : 2013-03-24 21:45 ID:ZWayxU7w [Del]

http://www.hyperstealth.com/Quantum-Stealth/
There you go op

5 Name: Chrome : 2013-03-26 20:59 ID:/aeHcN0I (Image: 500x500 jpg, 109 kb) [Del]

src/1364349571880.jpg: 500x500, 109 kb
Actually the United States has been using invisible outfits like above in war since to years ago and I have been advancing it so it can be used more and United States had it first is my point them stupid bastards got it first unfortunately

6 Name: Thiamor (on another computer) !Enough.h12 : 2013-03-27 04:24 ID:iGuYIoa3 [Del]

>>1
Having dirty sex in the public is now a thing of the past.

7 Name: Galahad !FsGJFxGl82 : 2013-03-27 08:10 ID:6lSdJ/1y [Del]

That's for real? I see they got an interview at news and everything but no demonstration so far.

8 Name: Anugar !8wy2pTNghM : 2013-03-27 16:47 ID:wZSkQbd6 [Del]

People usually say "pics or it didn't happen", well on this one I say videos or it didn't happen.

9 Name: W4L : 2013-03-27 18:51 ID:+QxhBeoo [Del]

Never trust 9gag...
Especially when they don't provide any sources for the information and pictures

Modern "invisibility cloaks" are not big enough to cover anything near the size of a human or even a small animal yet, not to mention theyre expensive as hell to develop/create.

10 Name: sean king : 2013-03-29 22:49 ID:s1ItYKjb [Del]

if the cloak bends light, why does it show the image behind the person? if this where real, the cloak itself would be see-through, like water.

11 Name: Anugar !8wy2pTNghM : 2013-03-31 17:00 ID:VlRv9/I0 [Del]

>>10 Hah. bitch slap on myself.

You, my friend, just said it all.

People, thanks to Sean thinking, this is now fake.
Sage your post in this thread. (Check the little box that says "Sage: []" befor clicking "Reply")

//Saged

12 Name: sean king : 2013-03-31 17:31 ID:EjuIA6EM [Del]

thank you, Anugar. you are a gentleman and a scholar

13 Name: Thiamor (on another computer) : 2013-03-31 21:17 ID:QWsusY3V [Del]

Actually using many tiny optical fibers could in-fact make it show what is behind it.

For instance, it'll just recreate the lighting, shadows, colors and shapes it see's and uses it in the front.

Now this isn't what it'd do, as it is fake, but my idea above is highly possible.

14 Name: aria : 2013-04-01 00:06 ID:sPnOb3QE [Del]

actually there is a news article on it. its on dogonews.com

15 Name: Anugar !8wy2pTNghM : 2013-04-01 08:58 ID:VlRv9/I0 [Del]

>>12 You are very welcome.

>>14 You can't just point to the website you know, you have to show us the article..

//saged

16 Name: Eros (school) : 2013-04-02 12:57 ID:GMAPwAjv [Del]

>>10 The cloak would be see through, like water. This means that the cloak itself is invisable, but it would still show the person trying to hide behind it, right? Just asking for confirmation on my thinking.

17 Name: Anugar !8wy2pTNghM : 2013-04-02 15:28 ID:VlRv9/I0 [Del]

>>16 That has already been said, check older postes.

//saged

18 Name: Eros (school) : 2013-04-04 11:30 ID:GMAPwAjv [Del]

>>17 I know its been said, I was saying and asking to make sure I didn't misunderstand.

/sage