I have found information about this before, and just started earnestly researching it, its crazy how something that seems so unrealistic is possible! You never know, maybe FMA:B is possible... Wishful thinking can really suck sometimes.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_transmutation

i can just imagine being a mutant that can read minds...... so cool

extreme awesome

Although such transmutation from FMA would be amazing speaking in realistic terms and prior knowledge having studied advanced college credited Chemistry...it's damn near impossible. Although it is possible to change lead form gold it requires a very large machine, a lot of funding money and a lot of time.When such a time occurs that FMA alchemy exists in this world you may rub it in my face that I was wrong.

No you are veyr much so right, I was just fantasizing ^_^
It costs about 9bil to make a couple particles, and a couple thousand firings to get a weighable amount, on the other hand gold to lead is fairly easy, and can happen over time if one left gold in a reactor due to beta decay.

*very

you do know that this is fake right wikipedia is not a reliable source anybody can make a wikipedia page that incorperates these things together and what they discribe is similar to a SP2-hybrid which is unpairing a pair of valence electrons to get to an ionic or covelent bond with eight valence electrons

you do know that this is fake right wikipedia is not a reliable source anybody can make a wikipedia page that incorperates these things together and what they discribe is similar to a SP2-hybrid which is unpairing a pair of valence electrons to get to an ionic or covelent bond with eight valence electrons

Wikipedia has been proven something like 85% more accurate than THE Encyclopedia Britannica. People should quit saying it's inaccurate. That was true in early 2000's.

>>8
You know the rules and regulations Wikipedia uses for each article? If it's any bit wrong it's either edited by someone in a correct fashion, or totally deleted.

Back maybe 4 or 5 years ago, minimum, maybe they would have some fake articles.

Nowadays it's such a uses tool, they cannot afford to have it as unreliable as it was in the past.

Used*

>>8 Anei, you are a fucking moron. Regardless of wikipedia's credibility, elements are indeed differentiated by their proton count, and you create new elements through the removal or addition of protons (alpha decay, for example, removes two protons from the nucleus of an atom).

Source - Chemistry: The Central Science 11th Edition, Theodore Brown, Prentice Hall