Dollars BBS | Technology

feed-icon

Main

News

Animation

Art

Comics

Films

Food

Games

Literature

Music

Personal

Sports

Technology

Random

Apple Technology and Market Applications (7)

1 Name: MKOLLER !YYk5m0jo12 : 2012-03-24 00:18 ID:c3YdC+G2 [Del]

An article was published by the BBC a few days ago pertaining to Apple's long term plans. Apparently the company, which is now valued at half a trillion US dollars, is planning on spending as much as half of its annual profits in a long-term strategy they unveiled during the week. The whole article can be found here, but I want to highlight a few things that caught my interest.

For starters, the rhetoric used by the executives of the company points to a rather offensive stance in the electronics market unseen for quite some time. With terms such as "war chest" and "building out our infrastructure," it sounds like they're fortifying a small country as opposed to simply expanding a corporation.

Next, the fact that they are buying back stock while initiating a dividend screams to me that they are trying to inflate the stock itself. The prospect of a dividend will drastically increase the demand for stock in the company; meanwhile the buyback of stock will decrease the overall amount of stock available to the public. Through combination of these factors, the price of shares in Apple Inc. could skyrocket, from $600 a share today, to nearly $900 in the coming years or even months.

Then there's talk of acquisitions and strategic prepayments. Before we get into that, we have to bear in mind that Apple already has a record of legal attacks on other companies, such as those who helped the Android market become Apple's main competition. And let's not forget how Microsoft and Apple have fought in the legal sector for years now.

If Apple manages to get a grip on the smaller entities surrounding Google's Android OS, they could potentially weaken it and pull much farther ahead than they are now. After all, if you remove a castle's foundation, it will sink under its own weight, or so they say.

But what does this all amount to? At this point, Apple Inc. could buy their own country if they so wished. Their GDP does, after all, exceed that of third world countries. Of course, it would be pointless to do so unless said territory contained some vital resource to power Apple's technological empire. That's all mere speculation bordering on fictional ideals.

Still, one thing bothers me. Educational grants by the US government have allowed for the purchase of iPads and Mac computers, yet I have yet to hear about Apple contracting with the military or with the health care initiative under President Obama. The military has been known to use unorthodox hardware in the past, such as the purchase of 2200 PS3s back in 2009.

It would make perfect sense for the government to purchase iPads for mobile operations due to their light weight and durability in the field. It would also make sense for every hospital to use iPads as the "Clipboard of the Future;" in fact, it's been discussed by students at my university. You see, Oregon Institute of Technology is a medical school in addition to being a technical school; and a partnership exists between the university and Sky Lakes Medical Center, which is conveniently located across from the campus. But that's neither here nor there.

The point is, if Apple were to contract with the US government, or any other government, to distribute tablet computers throughout the respective military and medical facilities, then Apple would be set to acquire billions, if not trillions, of dollars. The amount of money and influence the corporation would then have is indescribable. Of this I have no doubt.

Still, we won't know Apple's true motive until they start to act, and it will not be long now. What do you guys think? Please feel free to share your thoughts on the matter. It is important we keep an eye on this corporation, because what they decide to do could impact technology worldwide, and those changes could even impact us as a community (such as how we exchange information, communicate or even how we accomplish missions).

2 Name: Black!5L7V/xvR76 : 2012-03-25 11:01 ID:/e/WiOmg [Del]

>>1
Dang, nice analysis man. Anywho, I think the U.S. government might (in the future) have to step in to prevent a monopoly of the industry. Personally I like the Android OS better (for multiple reasons), but Apple is certainly ahead, at least in the U.S. Apple's always had curious business strategies, like raising the prices on their devices instead of lowering them. This should've made their products less desirable, but they ran efficient ads and hyped it up to what it is today.

3 Name: reilyx !.18ItdoukM : 2012-03-25 15:34 ID:5DTEO+KB [Del]

Bworp, suppose I'll finally get around to this.

For the most part, I feel like this is a ploy for business progression. Yes, they have a lot of money. But as a business, they naturally want more to support their growing technologies.

Personally, I'm in support of their nonsense. I see a LOT of otherwise stagnant money beginning to move. Jobs being created, technology being advanced. The flow that comes with that will help to improve our economy, and that's fantastic.

For the most part, I think it's just business. However, the immediate positive effects outweigh the immediate negative ones. Long-term, this amount of influence could be extremely painful. However, I don't see Apple taking a dive for a little while. Especially not with a move like this.

As for the interactions with Google... Well, we just have to wait and see what Google plans to do. I don't know what companies Apple owns, but Google owns about 115 that are based almost solely around technology. They've been just as much a spearhead as Apple has.

That said, I think that Google will win long-term. Apple products are nice and desirable, but Apple makes their products in a manner opposite of how we learn. Think of both companies as car companies. Google makes a really customizable model, while Apple makes a model that has almost no room for change. In the end, the company that allows for change will win out, because the opportunity for change allows users to progress the technology on their own.

Hang in there Google!

4 Name: MKOLLER !YYk5m0jo12 : 2012-03-25 20:13 ID:c3YdC+G2 [Del]

>>2 You know, for a second I had completely forgotten about the Anti-Trust Act, which makes it illegal for a corporation to form a monopoly. This would be able to combat the manipulation of their stock prices, if it becomes evident that Apple was intentionally doing so. Additionally, if Apple gets too large a share of the market, then the US government may force them to split into several corporate entities, not unlike what happened to AT&T in the 1980s. However, there would be staunch opposition by free-market supporters, who would argue that such an act could heavily devalue the company.

>>3 The thing about Google that I fear could weaken them is their love of Open Source. They feel the internet should be free, and therefore will not make as many moves as Apple. If they fall behind, Apple could easily swallow them up. On the other hand, it is this charitable nature that also gives them a great strength. Google is more respected as a corporation due to this degree of honesty. It's why their mission statement includes the phrase, "Don't Be Evil." Apple may get all of the money, but Google will win the heart of the people, and that may cause the people to turn on Apple in the end, like you say.

And there's one more thing, since you brought up Google. I've noticed Google is trying to diversify, such as by researching technologies pertinent to the energy market. There was an article in the Klamath Falls Herald and News some time ago about a hydroelectric plant opening up in the area. Apparently it received a huge piggyback from Google, Inc. So even if Google loses this battle with Apple, they have options. Just something we should keep in mind.

5 Name: reilyx !.18ItdoukM : 2012-03-25 21:29 ID:5DTEO+KB [Del]

>>4 Precisely. Google has invested in so many different places that they will always have an influence. If I remember correctly, they didn't begin battling with Apple directly until just a few years ago. Google was late to the party to begin with, as they were allocating their resources elsewhere.

I think that Google has far more potential than Apple, but Apple has the potential for an immediate economic and technological boost.

With the burst that we are sure to see in the next few years, a plethora of technologies may become available to the public. While those are being released, Google may take some of the ideas and use them elsewhere. Sometimes making the second move is the better decision.

7 Name: Pineapplez!lsl.FRUIts : 2012-04-26 15:52 ID:7ffj+CVr [Del]

Bump