So i must challenge my fellow dollars,

I want someone to prove me wrong.

I want some form of proof that there are more than 4 sexual orientation

the 4 being: heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, and Asexual

(and before some special snowflake tells me pansexual is a thing i will ask: 1: why do you want to fuck a pan? and

2: so if pan means you don't really see gender and would fuck anyone, how are you not bi? there are only two sexs male and female

Pan is specifically for personality. So it's not that you're attracted to both genders, it's that you are attracted to their personality.

>>2 Doesn't really matter than. It just means you like the person.

bi indicates that what you see is what you like, in both genders.

Bisexual: adj.) sexually attracted to both men and women.

Pansexual: adj.) not limited in sexual choice with regard to biological sex, gender, or gender identity.

They're different.

>>5

so in the end, pan is just bi, you look for their personally rather then gender, i understand that

BUT since their are only to genders that still makes you BI you just are a type of Bisexual.

so in the end they are the same, just because one is bi doesn't mean they always go after both, that's why Bi can have pref to one or the other or like both equally.

The only thing a pansexual does is. well the same thing, they pick on preference. so i don't see a difference

>>1 Please change your username. You're embarrassing the rest of us from Tennessee.

i actually agree with OP on this one guys (not gunna bump this tho)

Two different paths can still lead to the same result. It all comes down to perception and interpretation. This also pertains to the original question; does one only perceive four different results, or can more be created and accepted? In black and white there are only two outcomes of Schrodinger's cat, but if you choose to accept it the outcomes cannot be held to a finite quantity.

yea so its incredibly difficult for me to get involved in a relationship with someone unless i'm already emotionally connected to them. I found out a couple weeks ago that this is called "Demi-sexual"

Its not like i don't crush on people or flirt with them if i like them, but if i'm going to consider a relationship with them, and/or if i'm going to have sex with them, I have to be emotionally connected.

I found this out the hard way... or should i say... the soft way... (im a guy btw... get it?)

As >>11 pointed out, demisexual is where you're usually not attracted to someone unless you are closer to them.

From what I understand, pan and bi are very similar, but for one gender tends to matter more. (Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong!)

yep. if there were only two accepted genders, you'd be right. you defined the question in a way that makes your answer the only correct one, especially because you can just say 'but that falls under the blanket term of (insert one of your four)' if anyone actually names a sexuality that isn't one of the four.

>>1 there is a thing called intersex, you do know that right? its when a person is born with both and/or an ambiguous sexual organs

>>11 The idea of "Demi-sexual" is just stupid. So you need to be close to someone to have a relationship? Congrats, you aren't a total slut. I can understand most of the other things posted here, but that one just really irks me because of how basic you have to be to classify as that.

>>15 It's not that they need to be closet o them to be in a relationship, it's that they aren't attracted to others that they don't know. They don't feel sexually attracted towards strangers, but they may towards people closer to them.

>>16 *closer to

I consider myself a demi/graysexual of sorts.
I'm a man and I consider girls very attracrive and I can't even play overwatch without getting a boner when looking at widows titties for over a few seconds :D
I do want a girlfriend (technically a zuccini)
And I tend to frequent websites like pornhub with my donger in my hand

However, I am not at all interested in sex. I find everything about it very repulsive and anything past sexual fantasy is wrong in my brain.

Sure you could consider me something like a sexually passive heterosexual or asexual heteroromantic, but I feel like having words for sexualities inbetween the four bases is a beneficial thing (:

Just because you can describe everything in four words doesn't mean that it's the best way to go about it.
For example there's only two phases of a day, day and night, so why do we have morning if we could just say "early day" or "Past Night" or something like that :D

>>18 "I do want a girlfriend (technically a zuccini)"

So... you want something that looks like a cucumber?

We have "morning" because it's 2 syllables.
This argument does not stand for "sexually passive heterosexual" or "asexual heteroromantic".

And holy shit dude, it just means you're horny but don't like pussies. Try looking up anal sex or blowjobs?

>>18 >>19 My bad, that's "zucchini".

>>20 Yeah.. My bad aswell on that :D
>>19 .1: Yeah sure, the example was shit, but I'm sure you can figure out what I meant by that :D
.2 Don't worry, my IQ's not below 0. And no, while I can be horny, I'm not remotely interested in and in fact disgusted by vaginal, anal, oral, handjobs or anyhowelseal sex.
Self pleasure is as far as I'm willing to go.

>>21 What was it then?

And so you're pretty much.... "I keep my junk to myself"?

What? and pretty much i guess?

Normally, I'd be able to tell you something, but right now I am Just NOT touching that.