If you could rule the world what would you do? What would you change, what laws would you put in place?

I'd start over from the medieval era.

i'd start over from the beginning of mankind. spare the freewill for everyone having common sense and no desire to conquer. no war=happy/safe everyone :3

take down religious superpowers a couple notches. Point a gun at every country. Control the money system so value never goes down. And make rupees the largest amount so everyone can feel the nostalgia

Sleepology that is a little evil don't you thank?

Nope, realistic. Ensures im not overthrown, ensures religion doesnt gain to much power n rebel.

but if i could start over, id start with greece. The dominoes would fall from there.

If I could rule the world, huh...?

Well: 1. Everyone would have to play Yu-Gi-Oh!. 2. Duel Points would be currency. 3. Everuone would get a starter deck at birth. All different. All weak.

>>8 would you be using the original cards or the newer versions

>>9 All cards. Super past, past, and new.

hm.......... acceptable.

>>8 My stardust dragon will overthrow you. It's OP as fuck.

So are my elemental heroes and my junk synchron.

>>12 Pffft... My friend can win almost any duel with his EH deck.

>>13 Oh boy, I haven't whipped out my deck in years.

.. And now I realize how overly sexual that sounded.

Anyways, a lot of the cards I have are banned now. IE, pot of greed, etc.
Your friend may have a good EH deck, but I have an onslaught of Trap and Spell cards. I use Scrap-iron scarecrow for EVERYTHING, not to mention Ookazi (I think that was the name) constantly destroys cards. Elemental heroes are overrated. I mean, have you seen my fucking dragon deck? That shit's boss. Super boss.

Godly, one might even say.

.. I'm such a geek ;n;

>>14 Anything able to not be killed by a monster who halves your monster's ATK and takes it as its own, as well as its 2800? I thought not.

>>15 Rephrase your sentence, it's fucking confusing.

I love Yu-gi-oh (well the original any ways) but can we answer the topic and talk about the card game?

>>15 Misplaced modifiers~

I would get rid of all bombs.

>>14 On my friends first turn: Fusion Summon, Fusion Summon, Future Fusion, Normal Summon, set a card. Three monsters who kick butt, devastating face down, and another monster on the way. Plus all the insanity he can cause in the two turns he has to wait for the Fusion monster. Usually killing the person on the turn Future Fusion Fusion Summons the monster.

Hello Flea why would you get rid of all of the bombs?

Name please no dulling

Hm, if I were to rule the world, I would:
-go back to when gasoline was 40 cents(now, it's $4-up)
-change the currency to diamonds/rupees/stones (idk, either)
-create a law that everyone gets a soundproof wall if needed

>>23 that is interesting but how do you justify your currency amd the sound proof walls?

>>24 you are apparently unaware how thin walls can be.

I would probably be an evil overlord of some kind. Blowing up countries, ruining lives, all that fun stuff. Granted I'm not like this usually, but all of that power can change a man(or is that not enough of an excuse?).

To outline my details as to what I would do and how I would maintain my rule, I direct you to this link:

http://www.eviloverlord.com/lists/overlord.html

>>25 I live in a trailer trust me i know i'm just interested to see how he justifies it.

>>24 I actually have no idea about the currency part, but maybe trade with other countries?
>>25 This.

>>28 well that is interesting

When I rule the world/Galaxy I'm gonna change currency to Energy ( everything in our lives is governed by energy) I'm gonna get everyone off this planet and into the stars, I'm gonna make a cell regeneration machine so that we can live forever. Everyone who wants to live on earth has to help rebuild the planet to make it become (Eden) Mother Earth. The technology I would design would make it so we could travel the entire univers fun

Make communism work with me being the evil overlord, creating dystopia and making myself immortal.

3 naps and 2 snacks a day.

I wouuuuld make every healthy citizen from every country go on exchange for 2 years. Just to see how they fit in...

Then I'm going to direct scientists to make Angelic Layer a reality. And then flying fish from Galileo Donna.

>>30 That's one hell of a thread resurrection...

I'd just make humans extinct. Myself included.
maybe.

>>34 You could turn into Utawarerumono, mostly human but slightly animal with the ability to overcome all diseases much better.

the 10 Pledges

1. All murder, war, and robbery is forbidden in this world.
2. All conflict in this world will be resolved through games.'
3. In games, each player will bet something that they agree is of equal value.
4. As long as it doesn't violate pledge three, anything may be bet, and any game may be played.
5. The challenged party has the right to decide the rules of the game.
6. Any bets made in accordance with the pledges must be upheld.
7. Conflicts between groups will be conducted by designated representatives with absolute authority.
8. Being caught cheating during a game is grounds for an instant loss.
9. In the name of god, the previous rules may never be changed.
10. Let's all have fun and play together!

who knows what might happen~?

>>36 Shit happens

A modified version Asimov's Laws would neat.

A person must protect their own existence.

A person may not injure another person or, through inaction, allow another person to come to harm, unless such action would conflict with the First Law.

A person is not required to obey the orders given by another person, especially where such orders would conflict with the First or Second Laws.

>>38 Sounds reasonable enough.

>>38 ooo I'm sooo electing you as the next president

>>38 Then comes the ambiguity of human perception. What if the person considers it necessary to harm another to protect their existence, but another person feels those actions were unnecessary? (An example could be a prank being mistaken for an assault and the pranker being harmed in what was initially assumed to be self-defense.)

If someone's actions are considered 'risky' and put their own existence at harm, are they also breaking the first law?

And will existence solely refer to a beating heart, or to a person's existence in its entirety, including their livelihood? If it's simply a beating heart, can it be argued that threatening someone's livelihood can threaten their ability to physically care for themselves and thus require protective action?

Things get messy with perception-influenced laws, especially when you try to apply them to a society where personal morals heavily vary between individuals.

It's the judicial systems job to interpret the law. That an issue we already deal with.

And as for the first law it's more of a right than something to enforce. I could've worded it better but I was just adapting the laws of robotics.

>>42 Yes, but you don't want laws so vague that they can be interpreted in wildly different ways depending on those involved. And it's because we already deal with it that we know it's an issue precautions can be taken against o: