>>2Actually, Araya is correct in this assessment. The concept of "Marry for love" is actually fairly new to society - For years and years marriage was simply arranged by the parents in an effort to secure their family's trade or social/monetary standing.
You can thank Hollywood and authors for the digging the "Marry for Love" concept into our head.
It's not so much "all that's left is money", as it is "Money is still a contributing factor".
Now if his goal was to take her money and then leave her (and you, by this time), then that is a substantially different situation and has been both socially unacceptable and frowned upon even during the beginning of the whole 'pragmatic marriage' concept. Married is Married, up until very recently - whether you liked it or not, you're stuck with the person you married unless they died.
But I'm curious, what do you mean she traded her life for money? If you don't mind me prying of course.