>>19 That would be... interesting :|
Also, I'd like to apologize for all the typos in
>>10 and fix something in
>>17. I accidentally kept typing "disassociated" when it was "dissociated".
There are two minor unspecified categories of DD for personality problems (which still aren't just called "DD", by the way). One is for those that seem dissociated but don't really fit any disease, and one is for those which resemble a disease but aren't at all serious enough to be categorized as them. There is a possibility that the second is what
>>16 was thinking of. However, considering the limits of the conditions, it's not particularly relatable to a full blown discussion relating to DID, and
>>16's opinion cannot be compared to that of someone who truly and honestly has DID or another DD condition and/or struggles with it consistently.
>>18 General consensus that I've heard is that they usually don't have the conditions they're flaunting or are flaunting such because of another condition on top of it. There are a lot of various mental diseases which cause that type of behavior (wish I had the name of one off the top of my head to reference; I'll look it up again later), sometimes to the point where they're willing to harm themselves to make their point or get the attention that they physically need. They probably don't just have severe depression. Most likely, they had another condition that was making them really need the attention from it, and when they didn't get it, not only were their previous threats looming over head, but their depression piled on top if it and finally made them break down and try to kill themselves.
(I'm not a psychologist - just rambling. And the rest of you hypochondriacs better not try to use that last paragraph as an excuse to be assholes.)
Or something to that effect. Shit's too complex for my head right now.