>>8 read what
>>4 said he/she even gave a link. :P
when looking at a news thread it helps to read what others have said before, instead of just jumping in, otherwise you will look silly and foolish when someone else has updated the news thread with another news article a few posts before hand.
but
>>5 >>6 and
>>7 should have posted something a little bit more intelligibly instead of "we must fight back" bla bla bla, god just make people seem dumb here as rowdy gang of misfits vigilantes -_-
The thread more or less ended when
>>4 posted what he/she did, what should have happen was a discussion on the speculation what kind of possible punishment that the individuals who participated in the crime will get.