Original Story: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/06/obama-iran-executive-order_n_1257186.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Ccompaq-desktop%7Cdl12%7Csec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D133093


WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama has ordered new sanctions on the Islamic republic, including its Central Bank, in a move to enforce a law he signed in December.

In a letter to Congress Monday, Obama said the tougher sanctions are warranted "particularly in light of the deceptive practices of the Central Bank of Iran and other Iranian banks." He said the problems included the hiding transactions of sanctioned parties, the deficiencies of Iran's anti-money laundering regime and the unacceptably high risk posed to the entire international financial system posed by Iran's activities.

The Central Bank sanctions were included as an amendment in the wide-ranging defense bill Obama signed into law at the end of 2011. The White House said Obama signed the executive order approving the sanctions on Sunday, well ahead of the six-month window he was afforded in the defense bill.

Obama's fresh swipe at Tehran come as the White House tries to both ratchet up pressure on the Islamic republic to abandon its nuclear program and dissuade Israel from launching a unilateral strike on Iran, a move that could roil the Middle East and jolt the global economy.

Obama said Sunday he does not believe Israel has yet decided whether to attack Iran and still believes a diplomatic solution is possible.

Iran insists that its nuclear pursuit is for peaceful purposes, but the West accuses Iran of developing the know-how to build a nuclear bomb. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta last week would not dispute a report that he believes Israel may attack Iran this spring in an attempt to set back the Islamic republic's nuclear program.

A Treasury Department statement said the sanctions underscore that the administration is determined to hold Iran accountable for meeting international obligations over its nuclear program. The statement said Iran should get the message that "it will face ever-increasing economic and diplomatic pressure" until it answers the world's well-founded concerns about its nuclear intentions.

The department also said foreign financial institutions engaged in "arms-length transactions" with the Central Bank would not be impacted by the sanctions that Obama ordered Sunday, but remain at risk of such penalties if they undertake significant transactions with the bank or other Iranian financial institutions.

The sanctions amendment in the defense bill compelled U.S. punishment of foreign financial institutions that conduct transactions through Iran's Central Bank in order to import petroleum. Several U.S. allies in Europe and Asia engage in such business with Iran.




The administration expressed concern at the time that the sanctions could lead to a spike in global oil prices, hampering the American economic recovery and perhaps perversely enabling Iran to reap even greater revenues from its oil exports. That would defeat the purpose of the bill, which is to hamper Tehran's alleged support for international terrorism and its ability to fund its nuclear enrichment program.

Under the law, Obama had the option of waiving penalties for national security reasons.

The White House sees sanctions as an effective method of increasing pressure on Iran and officials say the penalties have started to squeeze Iran's economy.

In recent weeks, both the U.S. and European Union have imposed harsher sanctions on Iran's oil sector, the lifeblood of its economy.

In Washington, the Senate Banking Committee also easily approved yet more penalties on Tehran last week. The sweeping measure, which is not yet law, would target Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, require companies that trade on the U.S. stock exchanges to disclose any Iran-related business to the Securities and Exchange Commission, and expand penalties for energy and uranium mining joint ventures with Tehran.

I'm so sorry for saying this, most Americans may hate me now since I'm no American and I'm too lazy to read this.
But, if you vote for republicans, it'll be China who wins over America.
Obama did a great job.
Unfortunately a lot of Americans don't see that.

>>2 it's not that obama did a horrible job, as most people seem to believe in America, it's that congress limited what he could actually do. no one wanted to do shit for the other side, and it was just filibuster after filibuster. not only that, but what they DID pass only added power to the government in ways that are highly unconstitutional. we're fucked if we continue down this path.

Incidently, i do not think that any of the republican candidates will help the situation, and after NDAA, i'm a bit uneasy of Obama at this moment as well. i'm personally going to vote third party. not that it'll help dictate the outcome due to the brainwashing of the two party system, but i feel like i will have at least not contributed to the downfall of America.

>>3 Ron Paul is the only republican that I would vote for, but seeing as that's never going to happen I'm going to vote third party too, that is if I bother voting at all :L

Ima bring some crazy ridiculous politics ad for you guys to see later.
just a heads up.
you will be offended

>>3 As I said, that might be true indeed. Of course I don't know as much as an American, such as you, do. As the economic situation right now in America, it'll effect Europe as well, so it'll effect me. I truly hope for the citizens to vote well, and if Obama continues, I hope he'll make his promises come true.

>>3 Oh and btw, I'm Ciel, lol. I've begun a new account.

>>7 we shall always remember you as the horrible russian communist against american government foreva !

>>8 Iknoooowriigghtttt~~
Poor, poor me.

While we be on the topic of whether or not Obama was a horrible presidente or not, I dont really think any one could have done a much better job. Im not saying he was amazing n we should feed him nyan cat fart rainbows, but given the situation, not much couldve been done imo. Granted, I dont know much in the ways of politics, so i could be completely wrong.
As for this new thing that he just did, it seems like it could go horribly wrong, or go exactly as planned, time will tell.

>>6 well at least you seem to be a bit more well informed than some Americans -.-

I plan on voting for this guy by the way. I know what most of you will think, because it's how i feel as well. "this guy is fucking crazy", but you know what, he's right. if we had more people in the indset he's in, the world would be a different place.

>>10 agreed. especially since it's like i said, congress wasn't doing shit. wasn't letting anyone do shit. it was horrible. no one could have avoided it.