>>11 Honestly I don't see the point of social security. When it first started, it wasn't that much money because 4 people supported one senior citizen. Now that all the baby boomers are retiring, they're saying it's more like 2 people for one senior citizen so the amount of taxes we (people with jobs) have to pay has increased.
Frankly, it's not the government's job to take care of old people. It's the old people's children's job. You parents take care of you when you're young, and it's your responsibility to take care of your parents when they're old. Or maybe that's just my traditional thinking.
Anywho, if a riot does start because of that, the only people rioting will be senior citizens and the extremely poor (to qualify for medicare, you have to make WAY below minimum wage and the only way to achieve that is to not work, since even part timers aren't poor enough to qualify). Also, a 2 billion cut isn't that much. Most of the funds they cut were from education and transportation, since most voters are old, cutting social security is a no no. Oh wait, children can't vote! YAY let's just cut their education!!! :D
Sorry for the above.