Dollars BBS | Missions

feed-icon

Main

Introductions

Countries

Missions

Suggestions

News

Animation

Art

Comics

Films

Food

Games

Literature

Music

Personal

Sports

Technology

Random

Boycotting Thread (28)

1 Name: BarabiSama !lmBitchbiw : 2015-01-25 21:38 ID:J5Grmq1D [Del]

If you are interested in organizing a boycott (a refusal to use or purchase the goods or services of a particular company or product) as a Mission, you've come to the right thread to do it. Please reply to this thread using the following form when submitting one:
Boycott: [list the companies, services, products, etc.]
Reason: [explain why you want them boycotted by us]
Proof: [link credible references to prove the reason]

If the reason isn't biased and the proof is credible, your boycott will be added to an ongoing index in the thread for all members to see and consider participating in.

Related threads: Petitions, Dollars' Petitions.

2 Name: BarabiSama !lmBitchbiw : 2015-02-03 15:34 ID:4OygOUdT (Image: 800x800 jpg, 59 kb) [Del]

src/1422999247336.jpg: 800x800, 59 kb
Boycott Fifty Shades of Gray

Most of you probably aren't old enough to see it in the first place, but there's a boycott going around the internet against the Fifty Shades of Gray movie. Instead, people are asked to donate the money they would have spent to domestic violence shelters.

The reason is because of the story's positive portrayal of stalking and abuse. The original book was written as a fanfiction rape fantasy supposedly excused by its inaccurate representation of the BSDM community. Studies have also shown concern for it inspiring women to think positively of abusive relationships, develop eating/drinking disorders, etc.

Some insight.

3 Name: Magnolia!2ipznOcc5g : 2015-02-04 16:41 ID:gF6o6cBm [Del]

>>2

My God... This is utter bullshit. So sick and tired of people getting on the hate train when they have either 1) never read the book or 2) over analyzed it.

I hear often those of the BDSM community found the portrayal offensive, because the idea is about mutual pleasure.
There was mutual pleasure for both the main characters until he took her into his playroom. SHE was the one who ASKED HIM how much pain he likes, and HE was the one that TOLD HER that she could stop whenever she wanted.
This is the point where the title comes in and the character herself literally says that he is "50 shades of fucked up". It's at this point in time, that it's not about BDSM anymore; it's about the childhood sexual abuse he had suffered.

In the beginning she finds him too controlling, and his sexual desires were too extreme, and so she left him.
Get it? SHE LEFT HIM.

Having friends and family in abusive relationships, I know that this is something very hard to do, and includes so much emotional turmoil... I didn't know if I could do it... I really, truly admired Ana here. And hurts me and angers me how people diminish her as being a hapless victim in an "abusive relationship".

When they met again in the second book, they outlined what went wrong...
He acknowledges that he problems and he will work towards confronting them, and she says that she wants to support him through the process and try to be as understanding as she can.
I feel like people who see this differently, can't be as open minded as Ana, and comprehend what it's like to have to actually struggle to understand someone because of their past abuse and help them make a change that they themselves want to make.

That wasn't her falling back towards an abusive relationship; that WAS a relationship. You can either leave each other or work to improve yourself for each other in order to make it work.

At the end of the book, Grey shuns his past, unhealthy, abusive relationship with the woman who abused him, for a more healthy and supportive relationship with Ana.


Why the fuck didn't anyone care about this? Because Grey is a man, and no one saw this as an incredible victory for himself?

Once again, the hate wagon focuses on the negative, and also is a bit sexist.


The 3rd book was the last stretch of Grey's need for psychological need for control over Ana, and yes, there were fights, but also SHE LEFT HIM AGAIN.

And once again, he realized his wrongs, and wished to improve himself even more for the sake of their marriage and child.


I won't read that site, because I've read at least 10 others, and it's sickening what all people will say to down someone else's success.


What I will say though, is that one of my friends who had recently came from an abusive relationship, read the first book, and because the break up was too close to home, she didn't want to read the 2nd or 3rd.

So I wouldn't recommend this book to those who have experienced physical or sexual abuse simply because Christian Grey was sexually abused, and the physical attributes of their BDSM scenes might not work for someone who has survived physical abuse.

Overall, this book was a good, kinky read for people who are into Good, Kinky Reads...
Personally, I am going to re-read the first book, be at that theater the day it opens with wine and a vibrator, and I'm going to literally enjoy the fuck out of it. >=)

4 Name: Magnolia!2ipznOcc5g : 2015-02-04 16:45 ID:gF6o6cBm [Del]

>>2 By the way Babs, I'm not like, mad at you specifically. I just think that these books get a bad rap from "critics" who are parroting what the people around them say.
It's kind of like how people enjoyed Twilight and Beiber until it became cool to hate, insult, and state their opinions like it's fucking FACT.
I've just been seeing these patterns over time, and it just makes me explode how no one else seems to see this.

5 Name: BarabiSama !lmBitchbiw : 2015-02-04 18:49 ID:4OygOUdT [Del]

I'd appreciate it if debates could be avoided in this thread. If you don't want to be a part of boycotts that are suggested, then don't join them. You can argue about the book and critics all you want in Literature.

6 Post deleted by user.

7 Post deleted by user.

8 Name: Mag : 2015-02-04 21:07 ID:xBsJl6Bi [Del]

>>5 Ah, gotchya. I'll move it.

9 Name: Magnolia!2ipznOcc5g : 2015-03-11 09:12 ID:ALUBVVna [Del]

Hey mods, can you delete 3 & 4 for me? I spammed Babs thread on accident.

10 Name: Anonymous : 2015-03-11 12:20 ID:FboUbsH8 [Del]

Well then, lets boykott McDonalds.

11 Name: Magnolia!2ipznOcc5g : 2015-03-11 15:41 ID:U0/A+zLt [Del]

>>10 Fuck yeah. And Walmart.

Them sonsabitches...

12 Name: May : 2015-03-12 14:47 ID:2jZSo8zy [Del]

Well we can boykott some makeup who is know to use texts in animal, or industries who don't give a f*** to ambiental impact.

13 Name: Magnolia!2ipznOcc5g : 2015-03-12 19:33 ID:69uEoR8v [Del]

>>12 Fuck yeah to that too! But you gotta post the brand names, or a link to someone who's already done this, because I'm keen on buying some Maybelline.

14 Name: someguy : 2015-03-15 22:49 ID:Kl72+VNH [Del]

bump and no more shades

15 Name: Crona : 2015-03-16 07:15 ID:Mrv1xXOg [Del]

Bump.

16 Name: Magnolia : 2015-03-19 11:24 ID:ALUBVVna [Del]

17 Name: Bambi (bitchtrip here) : 2016-01-27 18:09 ID:SWQcXoRW [Del]

^

18 Name: FindMuck !MrEff/SKhc : 2016-05-26 17:00 ID:KtvqpIbY [Del]

mass bump

19 Name: Kazeki : 2016-08-02 07:27 ID:wdkVpy/U [Del]

bump

20 Name: Kazeki : 2016-08-08 17:25 ID:fYBQO1IA [Del]

bump

21 Name: Blanc !1Blanc.zuY : 2016-08-23 20:59 ID:1jfKDBZi [Del]

Bump ^

22 Name: Akihiro : 2016-08-24 03:26 ID:bB/x6SZq [Del]

Yo

23 Name: mudpuppy : 2016-08-24 15:08 ID:zxGsjGzg [Del]

Boycott: Nike
Reason: they have been found to be knowingly buying and using dog leather from China for their leather products. Also they have been using Kangaroo leather aswell.
Proof: http://investigations.peta.org/china-dog-leather/
http://www.takepart.com/article/2014/03/21/these-super-comfy-high-performance-shoes-are-made-kangaroo-skin

24 Name: Kazeki : 2016-08-26 08:17 ID:wdkVpy/U [Del]

bump

25 Name: Kazeki : 2016-10-09 05:12 ID:wdkVpy/U [Del]

bump

26 Name: No one special, just me : 2016-10-11 04:34 ID:RcfV0spO [Del]

>>23 kangaroo leather is actually really good leather, and dogs are sorta treated like livestock; however, if they were planning on keeping that a secret they should be boycotted. It's like the legal version of selling cow leather in India.

27 Name: Kazeki : 2016-11-09 08:30 ID:wdkVpy/U (Image: 1333x800 jpg, 238 kb) [Del]

src/1478701836778.jpg: 1333x800, 238 kb
I thought I should probably post this, since no one else has yet...

Boycott: Nestle
Reason: Besides California, they've been draining water from other places experiencing drought.
Proof: https://secure.canadians.org/ea-action/action?ea.client.id=1899&ea.campaign.id=56392

28 Name: Shiro !SHirOszFlY : 2017-02-24 11:45 ID:sisyt5Wq [Del]

bump