>>24 Do you even gramatically write, bro? But srsly, that was a shit train of a post. It was like reading a Pewdiepie bro's comment on a video.
Let's break down my response, though, to help you understand it.
1) As biased or whatever this may sound, no, I have not, but I played GTA III, San Andreas, Vice City, IV, and a few others (includibng I and II), and let me tell you, aside from I and II, they are essentially all the same in gameplay with a few different things. That seems like a vast overstatement, but I think it to be true, and I think others would back me up on this in a logical sense.
2) Better graphics =/= better game. Just because a pile of shit (not saying GTA V is shit) is in high-definition, it doesn't mean that it's not a pile of shit; it just looks like a better, more presentable pile of shit, but it's shit none the less.
3) Multiple characters living their lives? Persona 3, Persona 4, Lost Odyssey... there are a lot of other games that get you involved with the lives of others in a much more deep and meaningful way. Hell, the Paper Mario series (excluding Sticker Star) has more deep and interesting characters, and those guys are limited to briefs descriptions and a few lines of dialouge if you have them selected during key events in which they interact and speak in place of Mario.
4) I don't like Saints Row, but it's not not fun. It's not shit. Saints Row beats GTA V in certain aspects, like a more sense of freedom and do whatever the fuck you want and cause mayham in SR, while GTA V beats SR in certain aspects as well, such as not being super overpowered and getting bored quickly after your twentith air strike on innocent civilians.
tl;dr You're stupid and can't write, some parts of GTA are better than SR and vice-versa, graphics don't make good games, and other games have better storylines and characters. GTA is essentially the same as GTA V with a few different things.
