>>24 Well at least you've given some thought to where you take things from. But the thing is that a lot of "renders" on deviantart are cropped images from art that wasn't originally done by the render's maker. From what I see they never link or give any credit to the original creator.
For example
>>5. The original piece of art is
this from an artist on a Japanese site called pixiv. A lot of anime art you can find in various places comes from there, it's a very prolific site. Did the place you took the picture in
>>5 mention the original artist at all? Or do they seem like the original creator themselves?
The pic in
>>7 seems to be a manga coloring done by
this person. Did you take that image and edit or or take an already cropped out version from someplace else? If it's the latter then was the person I linked first ever mentioned?
It's a pretty delicate issue, art on the internet. It's pretty difficult to figure out what the original source of something is. A lot of people don't even care and think once it's online everything is fair game. It's up to you how much thought you want to give it and if you want to take the original creators into consideration or not.
